meanwhile d. john of austria was not losing time, and heartened by the first help that philip ii sent, set about to gain all the results possible from the victory of gembleux. since this defeat the rebels had fallen back towards brussels, fearful lest d. john was going there, and he, leaving them in this belief, continued his plan of campaign with clever strategy, and in little more than a month became master of louvain, bouvignes, tilemont, sichem, diest, nivelles and philippeville. there he stopped, tired out by this hard work, in which fell on him not only the anxieties of a general, but the duties of a soldier, and there, too, he received the news of escovedo's death. this was the finishing stroke for d. john. it is not known when or through whom the information came to him; but the fatal news must have come quickly, as already on the 20th of april he wrote a beautiful letter to philip, true transcript of his noble, generous and christian soul[17].
a little later, while at namur, he writes on the 3rd of may to his friend d. rodrigo de mendoza: "of the little i shall say in this, the first thing shall be how grieved i am at the death of escovedo, the more that they do not find out from whence comes such an ill deed; because certainly, besides how greatly he was needed for h.m.'s service in what he was looking after, i also wanted him infinitely, and i have lost a great support, and even more so, i think, in the future. may god rest him in heaven, and reveal to me who killed him."
and further, he wrote to gian andrea doria on the 7th of june: "of escovedo's unhappy death i do not know what to say, particularly from such a distance, even if i could say anything were i nearer; but in my opinion it is a case which asks for prompt action more than words: but so many suspicions and no certainty stop one's mouth and tie one's hands, so at present one can only wait and feel what one must about such a servant and a case like this death of escovedo."
these are all d. john's papers about escovedo's death which have come down to us. though nothing in these letters shows clearly that he had sounded all the depths of iniquity hidden behind the treacherous crime, it is impossible to think to the contrary. from the first moment public opinion in madrid pointed at antonio pérez and the princesa de évoli as authors of the murder, and even, it is said, came near to the truth; a fact to be remembered, as those who wrote nearest the event, van der hammen and cabrera de córdoba, mention "that to authorise the assassination, antonio pérez gave the assassins a writing signed by the king, of the sort that are given blank to ambassadors and viceroys to shorten some business." the declaration of antonio enriquez at the famous trial eleven years later proves that these rumours reached beyond spain. "antonio enriquez said that in italy and flanders it was openly said that antonio pérez killed escovedo because of the princesa de évoli." it is impossible that these rumours should not have reached the ears of d. john, or that, with his shrewdness, he should not have put two and two together, the truth proved to him by the old story of their intrigue. one fact makes it patent that if d. john knew nothing for certain, he had at least very strong suspicions that antonio pérez was the murderer of escovedo. from this time the intimate correspondence which he kept up with the false secretary abruptly ceases, and he only replies to the honeyed, flattering letters by stiff and official dispatches such as could not be avoided between the governor-general and the secretary for flanders. and further, we think d. john must then have known, at any rate in part, of the treason and calumnies of pérez and the absolute ruin of his credit with d. philip effected by these means; which accounts for the depression, despondency, and presentiment of death that overwhelmed the hero of lepanto at this time, never to leave him during his remaining months of life.
