effeminacy of character arises from a prevalence of the sensibility over the will; or it consists in a want of fortitude to bear pain or to undergo fatigue, however urgent the occasion. we meet with instances of people who cannot lift up a little finger to save themselves from ruin, nor give up the smallest indulgence for the sake of any other person. they cannot put themselves out of their way on any account. no one makes a greater outcry when the day of reckoning comes, or affects greater compassion for the mischiefs they have occasioned; but till the time comes, they feel nothing, they care for nothing. they live in the present moment, are the creatures of the present impulse (whatever it may be)— and beyond that, the universe is nothing to them. the slightest toy countervails the empire of the world; they will not forego the smallest inclination they feel, for any object that can be proposed to them, or any reasons that can be urged for it. you might as well ask of the gossamer not to wanton in the idle summer air, or of the moth not to play with the flame that scorches it, as ask of these persons to put off any enjoyment for a single instant, or to gird themselves up to any enterprise of pith or moment. they have been so used to a studied succession of agreeable sensations that the shortest pause is a privation which they can by no means endure — it is like tearing them from their very existence — they have been so inured to ease and indolence, that the most trifling effort is like one of the tasks of hercules, a thing of impossibility, at which they shudder. they lie on beds of roses, and spread their gauze wings to the sun and summer gale, and cannot bear to put their tender feet to the ground, much less to encounter the thorns and briars of the world. life for them
rolls o’er elysian flowers its amber stream,
and they have no fancy for fishing in troubled waters. the ordinary state of existence they regard as something importunate and vain, and out of nature. what must they think of its trials and sharp vicissitudes? instead of voluntarily embracing pain, or labour, or danger, or death, every sensation must be wound up to the highest pitch of voluptuous refinement, every motion must be grace and elegance; they live in a luxurious, endless dream, or
die of a rose in aromatic pain!
siren sounds must float around them; smiling forms must everywhere meet their sight; they must tread a soft measure on painted carpets or smooth-shaven lawns; books, arts, jests, laughter occupy every thought and hour — what have they to do with the drudgery, the struggles, the poverty, the disease or anguish which are the common lot of humanity? these things are intolerable to them, even in imagination. they disturb the enchantment in which they are lapt. they cause a wrinkle in the clear and polished surface of their existence. they exclaim with impatience and in agony, ‘oh, leave me to my repose!’ how ‘they shall discourse the freezing hours away, when wind and rain beat dark december down,’ or ‘bide the pelting of the pitiless storm,’ gives them no concern, it never once enters their heads. they close the shutters, draw the curtains, and enjoy or shut out the whistling of the approaching tempest ‘they take no thought for the morrow,’ not they. they do not anticipate evils. let them come when they will come, they will not run to meet them. nay more, they will not move one step to prevent them, nor let any one else. the mention of such things is shocking; the very supposition is a nuisance that must not be tolerated. the idea of the obviate disagreeable consequences oppresses them to death, is an exertion too great for their enervated imaginations. they are not like master barnardine in measure for measure, who would not ‘get up to be hanged’— they would not get up to avoid being hanged. they are completely wrapped up in themselves; but then all their self-love is concentrated in the present minute. they have worked up their effeminate and fastidious appetite of enjoyment to such a pitch that the whole of their existence, every moment of it, must be made up of these exquisite indulgences; or they will fling it all away, with indifference and scorn. they stake their entire welfare on the gratification of the passing instant. their senses, their vanity, their thoughtless gaiety have been pampered till they ache at the smallest suspension of their perpetual dose of excitement, and they will purchase the hollow happiness of the next five minutes by a mortgage on the independence and comfort of years. they must have their will in everything, or they grow sullen and peevish like spoiled children. whatever they set their eyes on, or make up their minds to, they must have that instant. they may pay for it hereafter. but that is no matter. they snatch a joy beyond the reach of fate, and consider the present time sacred, inviolable, unaccountable to that hard, churlish, niggard, inexorable taskmaster, the future. now or never is their motto. they are madly devoted to the plaything, the ruling passion of the moment. what is to happen to them a week hence is as if it were to happen to them a thousand years hence. they put off the consideration for another day, and their heedless unconcern laughs at it as a fable. their life is ‘a cell of ignorance, travelling a-bed’; their existence is ephemeral; their thoughts are insect-winged; their identity expires with the whim, the folly, the passion of the hour.
nothing but a miracle can rouse such people from their lethargy. it is not to be expected, nor is it even possible in the natural course of things. pope’s striking exclamation,
oh! blindness to the future kindly given,
that each may fill the circuit mark’d by heaven!
hardly applies here; namely, to evils that stare us in the face, and that might be averted with the least prudence or resolution. but nothing can be done. how should it? a slight evil, a distant danger, will not move them; and a more imminent one only makes them turn away from it in greater precipitation and alarm. the more desperate their affairs grow, the more averse they are to look into them; and the greater the effort required to retrieve them, the more incapable they are of it. at first, they will not do anything; and afterwards, it is too late. the very motives that imperiously urge them to self-reflection and amendment, combine with their natural disposition to prevent it. this amounts pretty nearly to a mathematical demonstration. ease, vanity, pleasure are the ruling passions in such cases. how will you conquer these, or wean their infatuated votaries from them? by the dread of hardship, disgrace, pain? they turn from them, and you who point them out as the alternative, with sickly disgust; and instead of a stronger effort of courage or self-denial to avert the crisis, hasten it by a wilful determination to pamper the disease in every way, and arm themselves, not with fortitude to bear or to repel the consequences, but with judicial blindness to their approach. will you rouse the indolent procrastinator to an irksome but necessary effort, by showing him how much he has to do? he will only draw back the more for all your entreaties and representations. if of a sanguine turn, he will make a slight attempt at a new plan of life, be satisfied with the first appearance of reform, and relapse into indolence again. if timid and undecided, the hopelessness of the undertaking will put him out of heart with it, and he will stand still in despair. will you save a vain man from ruin, by pointing out the obloquy and ridicule that await him in his present career? he smiles at your forebodings as fantastical; or the more they are realised around him, the more he is impelled to keep out the galling conviction, and the more fondly he clings to flattery and death. he will not make a bold and resolute attempt to recover his reputation, because that would imply that it was capable of being soiled or injured; or he no sooner meditates some desultory project, than he takes credit to himself for the execution, and is delighted to wear his unearned laurels while the thing is barely talked of. the chance of success relieves the uneasiness of his apprehensions; so that he makes use of the interval only to flatter his favourite infirmity again. would you wean a man from sensual excesses by the inevitable consequences to which they lead? — what holds more antipathy to pleasure than pain? the mind given up to self-indulgence revolts at suffering, and throws it from it as an unaccountable anomaly, as a piece of injustice when it comes. much less will it acknowledge any affinity with or subjection to it as a mere threat. if the prediction does not immediately come true, we laugh at the prophet of ill: if it is verified, we hate our adviser proportionably, hug our vices the closer, and hold them dearer and more precious the more they cost us. we resent wholesome counsel as an impertinence, and consider those who warn us of impending mischief as if they had brought it on our heads. we cry out with the poetical enthusiast —
and let us nurse the fond deceit;
and what if we must die in sorrow?
who would not cherish dreams so sweet,
though grief and pain should come tomorrow?
but oh thou! who didst lend me speech when i was dumb, to whom i owe it that i have not crept on my belly all the days of my life like the serpent, but sometimes lift my forked crest or tread the empyrean, wake thou out of thy mid-day slumbers! shake off the heavy honeydew of thy soul, no longer lulled with that circean cup, drinking thy own thoughts with thy own ears, but start up in thy promised likeness, and shake the pillared rottenness of the world! leave not thy sounding words in air, write them in marble, and teach the coming age heroic truths! up, and wake the echoes of time! rich in deepest lore, die not the bed-rid churl of knowledge, leaving the survivors unblest! set, set as thou didst rise in pomp and gladness! dart like the sunflower one broad, golden flash of light; and ere thou ascendest thy native sky, show us the steps by which thou didst scale the heaven of philosophy, with truth and fancy for thy equal guides, that we may catch thy mantle, rainbow-dipped, and still read thy words dear to memory, dearer to fame!
there is another branch of this character, which is the trifling or dilatory character. such persons are always creating difficulties, and unable or unwilling to remove them. they cannot brush aside a cobweb, and are stopped by an insect’s wing. their character is imbecility, rather than effeminacy. the want of energy and resolution in the persons last described arises from the habitual and inveterate predominance of other feelings and motives; in these it is a mere want of energy and resolution, that is, an inherent natural defect of vigour of nerve and voluntary power. there is a specific levity about such persons, so that you cannot propel them to any object, or give them a decided momentum in any direction or pursuit. they turn back, as it were, on the occasion that should project them forward with manly force and vehemence. they shrink from intrepidity of purpose, and are alarmed at the idea of attaining their end too soon. they will not act with steadiness or spirit, either for themselves or you. if you chalk out a line of conduct for them, or commission them to execute a certain task, they are sure to conjure up some insignificant objection or fanciful impediment in the way, and are withheld from striking an effectual blow by mere feebleness of character. they may be officious, good-natured, friendly, generous in disposition, but they are of no use to any one. they will put themselves to twice the trouble you desire, not to carry your point, but to defeat it; and in obviating needless objections, neglect the main business. if they do what you want, it is neither at the time nor in the manner that you wish. this timidity amounts to treachery; for by always anticipating some misfortune or disgrace, they realise their unmeaning apprehensions. the little bears sway in their minds over the great: a small inconvenience outweighs a solid and indispensable advantage; and their strongest bias is uniformly derived from the weakest motive. they hesitate about the best way of beginning a thing till the opportunity for action is lost, and are less anxious about its being done than the precise manner of doing it. they will destroy a passage sooner than let an objectionable word pass; and are much less concerned about the truth or the beauty of an image than about the reception it will meet with from the critics. they alter what they write, not because it is, but because it may possibly be wrong; and in their tremulous solicitude to avoid imaginary blunders, run into real ones. what is curious enough is, that with all this caution and delicacy, they are continually liable to extraordinary oversights. they are, in fact, so full of all sorts of idle apprehensions, that they do not know how to distinguish real from imaginary grounds of apprehension; and they often give some unaccountable offence, either from assuming a sudden boldness half in sport, or while they are secretly pluming themselves on their dexterity in avoiding everything exceptionable; and the same distraction of motive and shortsightedness which gets them into scrapes hinders them from seeing their way out of them. such persons (often of ingenious and susceptible minds) are constantly at cross-purposes with themselves and others; will neither do things nor let others do them; and whether they succeed or fail, never feel confident or at their case. they spoil the freshness and originality of their own thoughts by asking contradictory advice; and in befriending others, while they are about it and about it, you might have done the thing yourself a dozen times over.
there is nothing more to be esteemed than a manly firmness and decision of character. i like a person who knows his own mind and sticks to it; who sees at once what is to be done in given circumstances and does it. he does not beat about the bush for difficulties or excuses, but goes the shortest and most effectual way to work to attain his own ends or to accomplish a useful object. if he can serve you, he will do so; if he cannot, he will say so without keeping you in needless suspense, or laying you under pretended obligations. the applying to him in any laudable undertaking is not like stirring ‘a dish of skimmed milk.’ there is stuff in him, and it is of the right practicable sort. he is not all his life at hawk-and-buzzard whether he shall be a whig or a tory, a friend or a foe, a knave or a fool; but thinks that life is short, and that there is no time to play fantastic tricks in it, to tamper with principles, or trifle with individual feelings. if he gives you a character, he does not add a damning clause to it: he does not pick holes in you lest others should, or anticipate objections lest he should be thought to be blinded by a childish partiality. his object is to serve you; and not to play the game into your enemies’ hands.
a generous friendship no cold medium knows,
burns with one love, with one resentment glows.
i should be sorry for any one to say what he did not think of me; but i should not be pleased to see him slink out of his acknowledged opinion, lest it should not be confirmed by malice or stupidity. he who is well acquainted and well inclined to you ought to give the tone, not to receive it from others, and may set it to what key he pleases in certain cases.
there are those of whom it has been said, that to them an obligation is a reason for not doing anything, and there are others who are invariably led to do the reverse of what they should. the last are perverse, the first impracticable people. opposed to the effeminate in disposition and manners are the coarse and brutal. as those were all softness and smoothness, these affect or are naturally attracted to whatever is vulgar and violent, harsh and repulsive in tone, in modes of speech, in forms of address, in gesture and behaviour. thus there are some who ape the lisping of the fine lady, the drawling of the fine gentleman, and others who all their life delight in and catch the uncouth dialect, the manners and expressions of clowns and hoydens. the last are governed by an instinct of the disagreeable, by an appetite and headlong rage for violating decorum and hurting other people’s feelings, their own being excited and enlivened by the shock. they deal in home truths, unpleasant reflections, and unwelcome matters of fact; as the others are all compliment and complaisance, insincerity and insipidity.
we may observe an effeminacy of style, in some degree corresponding to effeminacy of character. writers of this stamp are great interliners of what they indite, alterers of indifferent phrases, and the plague of printers’ devils. by an effeminate style i would be understood to mean one that is all florid, all fine; that cloys by its sweetness, and tires by its sameness. such are what dryden calls ‘calm, peaceable writers.’ they only aim to please, and never offend by truth or disturb by singularity. every thought must be beautiful per se, every expression equally fine. they do not delight in vulgarisms, but in common-places, and dress out unmeaning forms in all the colours of the rainbow. they do not go out of their way to think — that would startle the indolence of the reader: they cannot express a trite thought in common words — that would be a sacrifice of their own vanity. they are not sparing of tinsel, for it costs nothing. their works should be printed, as they generally are, on hot-pressed paper, with vignette margins. the della cruscan school comes under this description, which is now nearly exploded. lord byron is a pampered and aristocratic writer, but he is not effeminate, or we should not have his works with only the printer’s name to them! i cannot help thinking that the fault of mr. keats’s poems was a deficiency in masculine energy of style. he had beauty, tenderness, delicacy, in an uncommon degree, but there was a want of strength and substance. his endymion is a very delightful description of the illusions of a youthful imagination given up to airy dreams — we have flowers, clouds, rainbows, moonlight, all sweet sounds and smells, and oreads and dryads flitting by — but there is nothing tangible in it, nothing marked or palpable — we have none of the hardy spirit or rigid forms of antiquity. he painted his own thoughts and character, and did not transport himself into the fabulous and heroic ages. there is a want of action, of character, and so far of imagination, but there is exquisite fancy. all is soft and fleshy, without bone or muscle. we see in him the youth without the manhood of poetry. his genius breathed ‘vernal delight and joy.’ ‘like maia’s son he stood and shook his plumes,’ with fragrance filled. his mind was redolent of spring. he had not the fierceness of summer, nor the richness of autumn, and winter he seemed not to have known till he felt the icy hand of death!
