lord henry goade, who had, as we shall see, some personal acquaintance with sir oliver tressilian, tells us quite bluntly that he was ill-favoured. but then his lordship is addicted to harsh judgments and his perceptions are not always normal. he says, for instance, of anne of cleves, that she was the “ugliest woman that ever i saw.” as far as we can glean from his own voluminous writings it would seem to be extremely doubtful whether he ever saw anne of cleves at all, and we suspect him here of being no more than a slavish echo of the common voice, which attributed cromwell’s downfall to the ugliness of this bride he procured for his bluebeard master. to the common voice from the brush of holbein, which permits us to form our own opinions and shows us a lady who is certainly very far from deserving his lordship’s harsh stricture. similarly, i like to believe that lord henry was wrong in his pronouncement upon sir oliver, and i am encouraged in this belief by the pen-portrait which he himself appends to it. “he was,” he says, “a tall, powerful fellow of a good shape, if we except that his arms were too long and that his feet and hands were of an uncomely bigness. in face he was swarthy, with black hair and a black forked beard; his nose was big and very high in the bridge, and his eyes sunk deep under beetling eyebrows were very pale-coloured and very cruel and sinister. he had — and this i have ever remarked to be the sign of great virility in a man — a big, deep, rough voice, better suited to, and no doubt oftener employed in, quarter-deck oaths and foulnesses than the worship of his maker.”
thus my lord henry goade, and you observe how he permits his lingering disapproval of the man to intrude upon his description of him. the truth is that — as there is ample testimony in his prolific writings — is lordship was something of a misanthropist. it was, in fact, his misanthropy which drove him, as it has driven many another, to authorship. he takes up the pen, not so much that he may carry out his professed object of writing a chronicle of his own time, but to the end that he may vent the bitterness engendered in him by his fall from favour. as a consequence he has little that is good to say of anyone, and rarely mentions one of his contemporaries but to tap the sources of a picturesque invective. after all, it is possible to make excuses for him. he was at once a man of thought and a man of action — a combination as rare as it is usually deplorable. the man of action in him might have gone far had he not been ruined at the outset by the man of thought. a magnificent seaman, he might have become lord high admiral of england but for a certain proneness to intrigue. fortunately for him — since head where nature had placed it — he came betimes under a cloud of suspicion. his career suffered a check; but it was necessary to afford him some compensation since, after all, the suspicions could not be substantiated.
consequently he was removed from his command and appointed by the queen’s grace her lieutenant of cornwall, a position in which it was judged that he could do little mischief. there, soured by this blighting of his ambitions, and living a life of comparative seclusion, he turned, as so many other men similarly placed have turned, to seek consolation in his pen. he wrote his singularly crabbed, narrow and superficial history of lord henry goade: his own times — which is a miracle of injuvenations, distortions, misrepresentations, and eccentric spelling. in the eighteen enormous folio volumes, which he filled with his minute and gothic characters, he gives his own version of the story of what he terms his downfall, and, having, notwithstanding his prolixity, exhausted this subject in the first five of the eighteen tomes, he proceeds to deal with so much of the history of his own day as came immediately under his notice in his cornish retirement.
for the purposes of english history his chronicles are entirely negligible, which is the reason why they have been allowed to remain unpublished and in oblivion. but to the student who attempts to follow the history of that extraordinary man, sir oliver tressilian, they are entirely invaluable. and, since i have made this history my present task, it is fitting that i should here at the outset acknowledge my extreme indebtedness to those chronicles. without them, indeed, it were impossible to reconstruct the life of that cornish gentleman who became a renegade and a barbary corsair and might have become basha of algiers — or argire, as his lordship terms it — but for certain matters which are to be set forth.
lord henry wrote with knowledge and authority, and the tale he has to tell is very complete and full of precious detail. he was, himself, an eyewitness of much that happened; he pursued a personal acquaintance with many of those who were connected with sir oliver’s affairs that he might amplify his chronicles, and he considered no scrap of gossip that was to be gleaned along the countryside too trivial to be recorded. i suspect him also of having received no little assistance from jasper leigh in the matter of those events that happened out of england, which seem to me to constitute by far the most interesting portion of his narrative.
r. s.
