you remember — it’s not so long ago — the talk there was about dredge’s “arrival of the fittest”? the talk has subsided, but the book of course remains: stands up, in fact, as the tallest thing of its kind since — well, i’d almost said since “the origin of species.”
i’m not wrong, at any rate, in calling it the most important contribution yet made to the development of the darwinian theory, or rather to the solution of the awkward problem about which that theory has had to make such a circuit. dredge’s hypothesis will be contested, may one day be disproved; but at least it has swept out of the way all previous conjectures, including of course lanfear’s magnificent attempt; and for our generation of scientific investigators it will serve as the first safe bridge across a murderous black whirlpool.
it’s all very interesting — there are few things more stirring to the imagination than that sudden projection of the new hypothesis, light as a cobweb and strong as steel, across the intellectual abyss; but, for an idle observer of human motives, the other, the personal, side of dredge’s case is even more interesting and arresting.
personal side? you didn’t know there was one? pictured him simply as a thinking machine, a highly specialized instrument of precision, the result of a long series of “adaptations,” as his own jargon would put it? well, i don’t wonder — if you’ve met him. he does give the impression of being something out of his own laboratory: a delicate scientific instrument that reveals wonders to the initiated, and is absolutely useless in an ordinary hand.
in his youth it was just the other way. i knew him twenty years ago, as an awkward lout whom young archie lanfear had picked up at college, and brought home for a visit. i happened to be staying at the lanfears’ when the boys arrived, and i shall never forget dredge’s first appearance on the scene. you know the lanfears always lived very simply. that summer they had gone to buzzard’s bay, in order that professor lanfear might be near the biological station at wood’s holl, and they were picnicking in a kind of sketchy bungalow without any attempt at elegance. but galen dredge couldn’t have been more awe-struck if he’d been suddenly plunged into a fifth avenue ball-room. he nearly knocked his shock head against the low doorway, and in dodging this peril trod heavily on mabel lanfear’s foot, and became hopelessly entangled in her mother’s draperies — though how he managed it i never knew, for mrs. lanfear’s dowdy muslins ran to no excess of train.
when the professor himself came in it was ten times worse, and i saw then that dredge’s emotion was a tribute to the great man’s proximity. that made the boy interesting, and i began to watch. archie, always enthusiastic but vague, had said: “oh, he’s a tremendous chap — you’ll see — ” but i hadn’t expected to see quite so clearly. lanfear’s vision, of course, was sharper than mine; and the next morning he had carried dredge off to the biological station. and that was the way it began.
dredge is the son of a baptist minister. he comes from east lethe, new york state, and was working his way through college — waiting at white mountain hotels in summer — when archie lanfear ran across him. there were eight children in the family, and the mother was an invalid. dredge never had a penny from his father after he was fourteen; but his mother wanted him to be a scholar, and “kept at him,” as he put it, in the hope of his going back to “teach school” at east lethe. he developed slowly, as the scientific mind generally does, and was still adrift about himself and his tendencies when archie took him down to buzzard’s bay. but he had read lanfear’s “utility and variation,” and had always been a patient and curious observer of nature. and his first meeting with lanfear explained him to himself. it didn’t, however, enable him to explain himself to others, and for a long time he remained, to all but lanfear, an object of incredulity and conjecture.
“ why my husband wants him about — ” poor mrs. lanfear, the kindest of women, privately lamented to her friends; for dredge, at that time — they kept him all summer at the bungalow — had one of the most encumbering personalities you can imagine. he was as inexpressive as he is to-day, and yet oddly obtrusive: one of those uncomfortable presences whose silence is an interruption.
the poor lanfears almost died of him that summer, and the pity of it was that he never suspected it, but continued to lavish on them a floundering devotion as uncomfortable as the endearments of a dripping dog — all out of gratitude for the professor’s kindness! he was full, in those days, of raw enthusiasms, which he forced on any one who would listen when his first shyness had worn off. you can’t picture him spouting sentimental poetry, can you? yet i’ve seen him petrify a whole group of mrs. lanfear’s callers by suddenly discharging on them, in the strident drawl of western new york, “barbara frietchie” or “the queen of the may.” his taste in literature was uniformly bad, but very definite, and far more assertive than his views on biological questions. in his scientific judgments he showed, even then, a remarkable temperance, a precocious openness to the opposite view; but in literature he was a furious propagandist, aggressive, disputatious, and extremely sensitive to adverse opinion.
lanfear, of course, had been struck from the first by his gift of accurate observation, and by the fact that his eagerness to learn was offset by his reluctance to conclude. i remember lanfear’s telling me that he had never known a lad of dredge’s age who gave such promise of uniting an aptitude for general ideas with the plodding patience of the accumulator of facts. of course when lanfear talked like that of a young biologist his fate was sealed. there could be no question of dredge’s going back to “teach school” at east lethe. he must take a course in biology at columbia, spend his vacations at the wood’s holl laboratory, and then, if possible, go to germany for a year or two.
all this meant his virtual adoption by the lanfears. most of lanfear’s fortune went in helping young students to a start, and he devoted his heaviest subsidies to dredge.
“dredge will be my biggest dividend — you’ll see!” he used to say, in the chrysalis days when poor galen was known to the world of science only as a perpetual slouching presence in mrs. lanfear’s drawing-room. and dredge, it must be said, took his obligations simply, with that kind of personal dignity, and quiet sense of his own worth, which in such cases saves the beneficiary from abjectness. he seemed to trust himself as fully as lanfear trusted him.
the comic part of it was that his only idea of making what is known as “a return” was to devote himself to the professor’s family. when i hear pretty women lamenting that they can’t coax professor dredge out of his laboratory i remember mabel lanfear’s cry to me: “if galen would only keep away!” when mabel fell on the ice and broke her leg, galen walked seven miles in a blizzard to get a surgeon; but if he did her this service one day in the year, he bored her by being in the way for the other three hundred and sixty-four. one would have imagined at that time that he thought his perpetual presence the greatest gift he could bestow; for, except on the occasion of his fetching the surgeon, i don’t remember his taking any other way of expressing his gratitude.
in love with mabel? not a bit! but the queer thing was that he did have a passion in those days — a blind, hopeless passion for mrs. lanfear! yes: i know what i’m saying. i mean mrs. lanfear, the professor’s wife, poor mrs. lanfear, with her tight hair and her loose figure, her blameless brow and earnest eye-glasses, and her perpetual attitude of mild misapprehension. i can see dredge cowering, long and many-jointed, in a diminutive drawing-room chair, one square-toed shoe coiled round an exposed ankle, his knees clasped in a knot of red knuckles, and his spectacles perpetually seeking mrs. lanfear’s eye-glasses. i never knew if the poor lady was aware of the sentiment she inspired, but her children observed it, and it provoked them to irreverent mirth. galen was the predestined butt of mabel and archie; and secure in their mother’s virtuous obtuseness, and in her worshipper’s timidity, they allowed themselves a latitude of banter that sometimes turned their audience cold. dredge meanwhile was going on obstinately with his work. now and then he had queer fits of idleness, when he lapsed into a state of sulky inertia from which even lanfear’s admonitions could not rouse him. once, just before an examination, he suddenly went off to the maine woods for two weeks, came back, and failed to pass. i don’t know if his benefactor ever lost hope; but at times his confidence must have been sorely strained. the queer part of it was that when dredge emerged from these eclipses he seemed keener and more active than ever. his slowly growing intelligence probably needed its periodical pauses of assimilation; and lanfear was marvellously patient.
at last dredge finished his course and went to germany; and when he came back he was a new man — was, in fact, the dredge we all know. he seemed to have shed his blundering, encumbering personality, and come to life as a disembodied intelligence. his fidelity to the lanfears was unchanged; but he showed it negatively, by his discretions and abstentions. i have an idea that mabel was less disposed to deride him, might even have been induced to softer sentiments; but i doubt if dredge even noticed the change. as for his ex-goddess, he seemed to regard her as a motherly household divinity, the guardian genius of the darning needle; but on professor lanfear he looked with a deepening reverence. if the rest of the family had diminished in his eyes, its head had grown even greater.
