line rhythm or music depends on the shape of your lines, their relation to each other and their relation to the boundaries of your panel. in all good work this music of line is in harmony with the subject (the artistic intention) of your picture or drawing.
the two lines with the least variation are a perfectly straight line and a circle. a perfectly straight line has obviously no variety at all, while a circle, by curving at exactly the same ratio all along, has no variation of curvature, it is of all curves the one with the least possible variety. these two lines are, therefore, two of the dullest, and are seldom used in pictures except to enhance the beauty and variety of others. and even then, subtle variations, some amount of play, is introduced to relieve their baldness. but used in this way, vertical and horizontal lines are of the utmost value in rectangular pictures, uniting the composition to its bounding lines by their parallel relationship with them. and further, as a contrast to the richness and beauty of curves they are of great value, and are constantly used for this purpose. the group of mouldings cutting against the head in a portrait, or the lines of a column used to accentuate the curved forms of a face or 138figure, are well-known instances; and the portrait painter is always on the look out for an object in his background that will give him such straight lines. you may notice, too, how the lines drawn across a study in order to copy it (squaring it out, as it is called) improve the look of a drawing, giving a greater beauty to the variety of the curves by contrast with the variety lacking in straight lines.
the perfect curve of the circle should always be avoided in the drawing of natural objects (even a full moon), and in vital drawings of any sort some variety should always be looked for. neither should the modelling of the sphere ever occur in your work, the dullest of all curved surfaces.
although the curve of the perfect circle is dull from its lack of variety, it is not without beauty, and this is due to its perfect unity. it is of all curves the most perfect example of static unity. without the excitement of the slightest variation it goes on and on for ever. this is, no doubt, the reason why it was early chosen as a symbol of eternity, and certainly no more perfect symbol could be found.
the circle seen in perspective assumes the more beautiful curve of the ellipse, a curve having much variety; but as its four quarters are alike, not so much as a symmetrical figure can have.
perhaps the most beautiful symmetrically curved figure of all is the so-called egg of the well-known moulding from such a temple as the erechtheum, called the egg and dart moulding. here we have a perfect balance between variety and unity. the curvature is varied to an infinite degree, at no point is its curving at the same ratio as at any 139other point; perhaps the maximum amount of variety that can be got in a symmetrical figure, preserving, as it does, its almost perfect continuity, for it approaches the circle in the even flow of its curvature. this is, roughly, the line of the contour of a face, and you may note how much painters who have excelled in grace have insisted on it in their portraits. gainsborough and vandyke are striking, instances.
diagram vii.
egg and dart moulding from one of the caryatides from the erechtheum in the british museum
the line of a profile is often one of great beauty, only here the variety is apt to overbalance the unity or run of the line. the most beautiful profiles 140are usually those in which variety is subordinated to the unity of the contour. i fancy the greeks felt this when they did away with the hollow above the nose, making the line of the forehead run, with but little interruption, to the tip of the nose. the unity of line is increased, and the variety made more interesting. the idea that this was the common greek type is, i should imagine, untrue, for their portrait statues do not show it. 141it does occur in nature at rare intervals, and in most western nationalities, but i do not think there is much evidence of its ever having been a common type anywhere.
diagram viii.
illustrating variety in symmetry
note how the hollows marked a are opposed by fullnesses marked b.
in drawing or painting a profile this run or unity of the line is the thing to feel, if you would express its particular beauty. this is best done in the case of a painting by finally drawing it with the brush from the background side, after having painted all the variety there is of tone and colour on the face side of the line. as the background usually varies little, the swing of the brush is not hampered on this side as it is on the other. i have seen students worried to distraction trying to paint the profile line from the face side, fearing to lose the drawing by going over the edge. with the edge blurred out from the face side, it is easy to come with a brush full of the colour the background is immediately against the face (a different colour usually from what it is further away), and draw it with some decision and conviction, care being taken to note all the variations on the edge, where the sharpnesses come and where the edge is more lost, &c.
variety in symmetry.
the contours of the limbs illustrate another form of line variety—what may be called "variety in symmetry." while roughly speaking the limbs are symmetrical, each side not only has variety in itself, but there is usually variety of opposition. supposing there is a convex curve on the one side, you will often have a concave form on the other. always look out for this in drawing limbs, and it will often improve a poorly drawn part if more of this variation on symmetry is discovered.
the whole body, you may say, is symmetrical, 143but even here natural conditions make for variety. the body is seldom, except in soldiering, held in a symmetrical position. the slightest action produces the variety we are speaking about. the accompanying sketches will indicate what is meant.
diagram ix.
illustrating variety in symmetry
note how the hollows marked a are opposed by the fullnesses marked b.
of course the student, if he has any natural ability, instinctively looks out for all these variations that give the play of life to his drawing. it is not for him in the full vigour of inspiration that books such as this are written. but there may come a time when things "won't come," and it is then that it is useful to know where to look for possible weak spots in your work.
variety of thickness and accent.
a line of equal thickness is a very dead and inexpressive thing compared with one varied and stressed at certain points. if you observe any of the boundaries in nature we use a line to express, you will notice some points are accentuated, attract the attention, more than others. the only means you have to express this in a line drawing is by darkening and sharpening the line. at other points, where the contour is almost lost, the line can be soft and blurred.
it is impossible to write of the infinite qualities of variety that a fine draughtsman will get into his line work; they must be studied first hand. but on this play of thickness and quality of line much of the vitality of your drawing will depend.
