iskander was the youngest son of the prince of epirus, who, with the other grecian princes, had, at the commencement of the reign of amurath the second, in vain resisted the progress of the turkish arms in europe. the prince of epirus had obtained peace by yielding his four sons as hostages to the turkish sovereign, who engaged that they should be educated in all the accomplishments of their rank, and with a due deference to their faith. on the death of the prince of epirus, however, amurath could not resist the opportunity that then offered itself of adding to his empire the rich principality he had long coveted. a turkish force instantly marched into epirus, and seized upon croia, the capital city, and the children of its late ruler were doomed to death. the beauty, talents, and valour of the youngest son, saved him, however, from the fate of his poisoned brothers. iskander was educated at adrianople, in the moslemin faith, and as he, at a very early age, exceeded in feats of arms all the moslemin warriors, he became a prime favourite of the sultan, and speedily rose in his service to the highest rank.
at this period the irresistible progress of the turkish arms was the subject of alarm throughout all christendom.
constantinople, then the capital of the greek empire, had already been more than once besieged by the predecessors of amurath, and had only been preserved by fortunate accidents and humiliating terms. the despots of bosnia, servia, and bulgaria, and the grecian princes of etolia, macedon, epirus, athens, phocis, boeotia, and indeed of all the regions to the straits of corinth, were tributaries to amurath, and the rest of europe was only preserved from his grasp by the valour of the hungarians and the poles, whom a fortunate alliance had now united under the sovereignty of uladislaus, who, incited by the pious eloquence of the cardinal of st. angelo, the legate of the pope, and, yielding to the tears and supplications of the despot of servia, had, at the time our story opens, quitted buda, at the head of an immense army, crossed the danube, and, joining his valiant viceroy, the famous john hunniades, vaivode of transylvania, defeated the turks with great slaughter, relieved all bulgaria, and pushed on to the base of mount h?|mus, known in modern times as the celebrated balkan. here the turkish general, karam bey, awaited the christians, and hither to his assistance was iskander commanded to repair at the head of a body of janissaries, who had accompanied him to greece, and the tributary epirots.
had iskander been influenced by vulgar ambition, his loftiest desires might have been fully gratified by the career which amurath projected for him. the turkish sultan destined for the grecian prince the hand of one of his daughters, and the principal command of his armies. he lavished upon him the highest dignities and boundless wealth; and, whether it arose from a feeling of remorse, or of affection for a warrior whose unexampled valour and unrivalled skill had already added some of the finest provinces of asia to his rule, it is certain that iskander might have exercised over amurath a far greater degree of influence than was enjoyed by any other of his courtiers. but the heart of iskander responded with no sympathy to these flattering favours. his turkish education could never eradicate from his memory the consciousness that he was a greek; and although he was brought up in the moslemin faith, he had at an early period of his career, secretly recurred to the creed of his christian fathers. he beheld in amurath the murderer of his dearest kinsmen, and the oppressor of his country; and although a certain calmness of temper, and coolness of judgment, which very early developed themselves in his character, prevented him from ever giving any indication of his secret feelings, iskander had long meditated on the exalted duty of freeing his country.
dispatched to greece, to arrange the tributes and the treaties of the grecian princes, iskander became acquainted with the young nic?|us; and their acquaintance soon matured into friendship. nic?|us was inexperienced; but nature had not intended him for action. the young prince of athens would loll by the side of a fountain, and dream of the wonders of old days. surrounded by his eunuchs, his priests, and his courtiers, he envied leonidas, and would have emulated themistocles. he was passionately devoted to the ancient literature of his country, and had the good taste, rare at that time, to prefer demosthenes and lysias to chrysostom and gregory, and the choruses of the grecian theatre to the hymns of the greek church. the sustained energy and noble simplicity of the character of iskander, seemed to recall to the young prince the classic heroes over whom he was so often musing, while the enthusiasm and fancy of nic?|us, and all that apparent weakness of will, and those quick vicissitudes of emotion, to which men of a fine susceptibility are subject, equally engaged the sympathy of the more vigorous and constant and experienced mind of his companion.
to nic?|us, iskander had, for the first time in his life, confided much of his secret heart; and the young prince fired at the inspiring tale. often they consulted over the fortunes of their country, and, excited by their mutual invention, at length even dared to hope that they might effect its deliverance, when iskander was summoned to the army. it was a mournful parting. both of them felt that the last few months of their lives had owed many charms to their companionship. the parting of friends, united by sympathetic tastes, is always painful; and friends, unless this sympathy subsist, had much better never meet. iskander stepped into the ship, sorrowful, but serene; nic?|us returned to his palace moody and fretful; lost his temper with his courtiers, and, when he was alone, even shed tears.
