but after some time the artists everywhere applied themselves to representations of the gods. i find that the first bronze image, which was made at rome, was that of ceres; and that the expenses were defrayed out of the property that belonged to spurius cassius, who was put to death by his own father, for aspiring to the regal office. the practice, however, soon passed from the gods to the statues and representations of men, and this in various forms. the ancients stained their statues with bitumen, which makes it the more remarkable that they were afterwards fond of covering them with gold. i do not know whether this was a roman invention; but it certainly has the repute of being an ancient practice at rome.
it was not the custom in former times to give the likeness of individuals, except of such as deserved to be held in lasting 272 remembrance on account of some illustrious deed; in the first instance, for a victory at the sacred games, and more particularly the olympic games, where it was the usage for the victors always to have their statues consecrated. and if any one was so fortunate as to obtain the prize there three times, his statue was made with the exact resemblance of every individual limb; from which circumstance they were called “iconic?,” or “portrait statues.” i do not know whether the public statues were not erected by the athenians, and in honor of harmodius and aristogiton, who slew the tyrant,[211] an event which took place in the same year in which the kings were expelled from rome. this custom, from a most praiseworthy emulation, was afterwards adopted by all other nations; so that statues were erected as ornaments in the public places of municipal towns, and the memory of individuals was thus preserved, their various honors being inscribed on the pedestals, to be read there by posterity, and not on their tombs alone. after some time, a kind of forum or public place came to be made in private houses and in our halls, the clients adopting this method of doing honor to their patrons.
in former times the statues that were thus dedicated were clad in the toga. naked statues also, brandishing a spear, after the manner of the youths at their gymnastic exercises, were much admired; these were called “achillean.” the greek practice is, not to cover any part of the body; while, on the contrary, the roman and the military statues have the addition of a cuirass. c?sar, the dictator, permitted a statue with a cuirass to be erected in honor of him in his forum. as to the statues which are made in the garb of the luperci,[212] 273 they are of no older date than those which have been lately erected, covered with a cloak. mancinus gave directions, that he should be represented in the dress which he wore when he was surrendered to the enemy. it has been remarked by some authors, that lucius attius, the poet, had a statue of himself erected in the temple of the muses, which was extremely large, although he himself was very short.
equestrian statues are also held in esteem in rome; but they are of greek origin, no doubt. among the greeks, those persons only were honored with equestrian statues who were victors on horseback in the sacred games; though afterwards the same distinction was bestowed on those who were successful in the races with chariots with two or four horses: hence the use of chariots with us in the statues of those who have triumphed. but this did not take place until a late period; and it was not until the time of the late emperor augustus that we had chariots represented with six horses,[213] and also with elephants.
the custom of erecting chariots with two horses in honor of those who had discharged the office of pr?tor, and had passed round the circus in a chariot, is not of ancient date. that of placing statues on pillars is older, as it was done in honor of caius m?nius, who conquered the ancient latins, to whom the romans by treaty gave one-third of the spoil which they had obtained. it was in the same consulship also, that the “rostra” or beaks of the ships, which had been taken from the antiates when vanquished, were affixed to the tribunal; in the year of the city, 416.
for a very different, and more important reason, was the statue of horatius cocles erected, he having singly prevented the enemy from passing the sublician bridge: a statue which remains to this day.
then we have the statues of romulus and tatius without the tunic; and the equestrian statue of marcius tremulus, clad in the toga, before the temple of the castors, who twice subdued the samnites, and by the capture of anagnia delivered the people from their tribute.
nor must i forget to mention cneius octavius, on account of the language used by the senate. when king antiochus said, “i will give you an answer at another time,” octavius drew a line round him with a stick, which he happened to have in his hand, and compelled him to give an answer before he allowed him to step beyond the circle. octavius was unfortunately slain[214] while on this embassy, and the senate ordered his statue to be placed in the most conspicuous spot, which of course was the rostra. a statue appears also to have been decreed to taracia caia, or furetia, a vestal virgin, the same, too, to be placed wherever she might think fit; an additional honor, no less remarkable, it is thought, than the grant itself of a statue to a woman. i will state her merits in the words of the annals: “because she had gratuitously presented to the public the field bordering on the tiber.”
i find also, that statues were erected in honor of pythagoras and of alcibiades, in the corners of the comitium; in obedience to the command of the pythian apollo, who, in the samnite war, had directed that statues of the bravest and the wisest of the greeks should be erected in some conspicuous spot: and here they remained until sylla, the dictator, built the senate-house on the site. it is wonderful that the senate should then have preferred pythagoras to socrates, who, in consequence of his wisdom, had been preferred to all other men by the god himself; as, also, that they should have preferred alcibiades for valor to so many other heroes; or, indeed, any one to themistocles, who so greatly excelled in both qualities. the reason of the statues being raised on columns, was, that the persons represented might be elevated above 275 other mortals; the same thing being signified by the use of arches, a new invention which had its origin among the greeks. i am of opinion that there is no one to whom more statues were erected than to demetrius phalereus at athens: for there were three hundred and sixty erected in his honor, no more days being reckoned at that period in the year: these, however, were soon broken to pieces.
pedestrian statues have been, undoubtedly, for a long time in estimation at rome: equestrian statues are, however, of considerable antiquity, and women even have participated in this honor; for the statue of cl?lia is equestrian, as if it had not been thought sufficient to have her clad in the toga.
there are still extant some declamations by cato, during his censorship, against the practice of erecting statues of women in the roman provinces. however, he could not prevent a statue being erected at rome to cornelia, the mother of the gracchi, and daughter of the elder scipio africanus. she is represented in a sitting posture, and the statue is remarkable for having no straps to the shoes.
various circumstances prove, that the art of making statues was commonly practised in italy at an early period. the statue in the cattle market is said to have been consecrated to hercules by evander; it is called the triumphal hercules, and, on the occasion of triumphal processions, is arrayed in triumphal vestments. king numa dedicated the statue of the two-faced janus; a deity who is worshipped as presiding over both peace and war. the fingers are so formed as to indicate three hundred and sixty-five days,[215] or in other words, the year; thus denoting that he is the god of time and duration.
there are also etruscan statues dispersed in various parts of the world, which beyond a doubt were originally made in 276 etruria. i should have supposed that these had been the statues only of divinities, had not metrodorus of scepsis, who had his surname “misorom?us,” from his hatred to the roman name, reproached us with having pillaged the city of volsinii for the sake of the two thousand statues which it contained. it appears to me a singular fact, that although the origin of statues was of such great antiquity in italy, the images of the gods, which were consecrated to them in their temples, should have been formed either of wood or of earthenware, until the conquest of asia, which introduced luxury among us. it will be the best plan to enlarge upon the origin of the art of expressing likenesses, when we come to speak of what the greeks call “the plastic art,” for the art of modelling was prior to that of statuary. this last, however, has flourished to such an extraordinary degree that a full account of it would fill many volumes.
panda, or wah.—ailúrus fulgens.
we learn from mucianus, who was thrice consul, that there are still three thousand statues in rhodes, and it is supposed that there are no fewer in existence at athens, at olympia, and at delphi. what living mortal could enumerate them all? or of what utility would be such information? still, i may, perhaps, afford entertainment by giving some slight account of such of those works of art as are in any way remarkable, and stating the names of the more celebrated artists. of each of these it would be impossible to enumerate all the productions, for lysippus alone is said to have executed no less than fifteen hundred works of art, all of which were of such excellence that any one of them might 277 have immortalized him. the number was ascertained by his heir, upon opening his coffers after his death, as it was his practice to lay up one golden denarius out of the sum which he had received as the price of each statue.
this art has arrived at incredible perfection, both in successfulness and in boldness of design. as a proof of successfulness, i will adduce one example, and that of a figure which represented neither god nor man. we have seen in our own time, in the capitol, before it was last burnt by the party of vitellius, in the shrine of juno, a bronze figure of a dog licking its wounds. its miraculous excellence and its perfect truthfulness were not only proved by the circumstance of its having been consecrated there, but also by the novel kind of security that was taken for its safety; for since no sum appeared equal to its value, it was publicly enacted that the keepers of it should be answerable for its safety with their lives.
