there are very definite artistic limitations also.

there must always be a certain effect of hardness and thinness about utopian speculations. their common fault is to be comprehensively jejune. that which is the blood and warmth and reality of life is largely absent; there are no individualities, but only generalised people. in almost every utopia — except, perhaps, morris’s “news from nowhere”— one sees handsome but characterless buildings, symmetrical and perfect cultivations, and a multitude of people, healthy, happy, beautifully dressed, but without any personal distinction whatever. too often the prospect resembles the key to one of those large pictures of coronations, royal weddings, parliaments, conferences, and gatherings so popular in victorian times, in which, instead of a face, each figure bears a neat oval with its index number legibly inscribed. this burthens us with an incurable effect of unreality, and i do not see how it is altogether to be escaped. it is a disadvantage that has to be accepted. whatever institution has existed or exists, however irrational, however preposterous, has, by virtue of its contact with individualities, an effect of realness and rightness no untried thing may share. it has ripened, it has been christened with blood, it has been stained and mellowed by handling, it has been rounded and dented to the softened contours that we associate with life; it has been salted, maybe, in a brine of tears. but the thing that is merely proposed, the thing that is merely suggested, however rational, however necessary, seems strange and inhuman in its clear, hard, uncompromising lines, its unqualified angles and surfaces.

there is no help for it, there it is! the master suffers with the last and least of his successors. for all the humanity he wins to, through his dramatic device of dialogue, i doubt if anyone has ever been warmed to desire himself a citizen in the republic of plato; i doubt if anyone could stand a month of the relentless publicity of virtue planned by more. . . . no one wants to live in any community of intercourse really, save for the sake of the individualities he would meet there. the fertilising conflict of individualities is the ultimate meaning of the personal life, and all our utopias no more than schemes for bettering that interplay. at least, that is how life shapes itself more and more to modern perceptions. until you bring in individualities, nothing comes into being, and a universe ceases when you shiver the mirror of the least of individual minds.